top of page
Writer's pictureSandeep Pawar

Difference Between Cyberark PAM and Delinea PaM

CyberArk PAM and Delinea (formerly Thycotic) PAM, while both provide Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions, differ in their approach, features, scalability, and ease of use. Here’s a breakdown of the key differences:


1. Focus and Approach


• CyberArk PAM:

• CyberArk is a market leader in PAM, known for its robust, comprehensive security for privileged accounts.

• Its platform focuses heavily on large enterprises with complex infrastructures that need extensive control over privileged access.

• It provides advanced features such as privileged session monitoring, recording, and anomaly detection.

• It offers strong integration with cloud environments, DevOps, and on-premises systems.

• Delinea PAM:

• Delinea, formerly Thycotic, focuses on making PAM solutions simpler and more user-friendly while still being highly secure.

• It’s designed to be easily implemented and scalable from small to large enterprises.

• Emphasizes an easy-to-use interface and fast deployment, making it appealing for organizations looking for quick PAM solutions.

• Strong in its cloud-first approach and offers a streamlined experience for organizations adopting hybrid environments.


2. Ease of Implementation


• CyberArk PAM:

• Complex deployment and requires significant IT resources for setup and maintenance.

• Offers advanced customization options, making it suitable for organizations with more sophisticated PAM requirements but can be resource-intensive.

• Typically involves longer implementation times due to its extensive feature set and infrastructure needs.

• Delinea PAM:

• Quick to deploy, often considered more intuitive and easier to set up than CyberArk.

• Known for its fast time to value, allowing organizations to start managing privileged accounts rapidly.

• More user-friendly and often requires less technical expertise compared to CyberArk.


3. Scalability


• CyberArk PAM:

• Highly scalable, but its architecture is designed for larger enterprises with more complex environments.

• Best suited for large organizations that need robust and layered security around privileged accounts across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.

• Delinea PAM:

• Also scalable, but it’s designed to cater to small-to-mid-size businesses (SMBs) as well as large enterprises.

• More suitable for organizations that want quick growth and need a solution that can scale as they expand.


4. Key Features


• CyberArk PAM:

• Privileged Session Manager (PSM): Allows organizations to monitor, record, and control privileged sessions in real-time.

• Credential Vaulting: Provides secure storage for privileged credentials using high-level encryption.

• Threat Analytics: Offers real-time threat detection using machine learning and advanced analytics.

• Extensive Integrations: Integrates deeply with SIEM tools, DevOps pipelines, and cloud environments.

• Delinea PAM:

• Secret Server: Delivers a seamless, easy-to-use vaulting system to store and manage privileged credentials.

• Privileged Behavior Analytics (PBA): Provides insights into user behavior and potential security risks.

• Role-Based Access Controls: Simplifies access management by allowing administrators to set roles and permissions.

• Cloud-Ready: Delinea offers better native cloud support, making it easier for businesses with cloud-first strategies to integrate.


5. Cost


• CyberArk PAM:

• Generally has a higher cost due to its extensive features, complex deployment, and ongoing maintenance requirements.

• Typically chosen by large enterprises with significant budgets for security infrastructure.

• Delinea PAM:

• Considered more cost-effective and accessible for smaller organizations and mid-market businesses.

• Its simplicity in deployment and management reduces the total cost of ownership (TCO).


6. Cloud and DevOps Integration


• CyberArk PAM:

• Strong in hybrid cloud and multi-cloud environments with a focus on providing DevOps support through integrations with containerized environments, APIs, and DevOps tools like Ansible, Jenkins, etc.

• Extensive DevOps security suite for managing secrets and credentials in dynamic environments.

• Delinea PAM:

• More streamlined for cloud environments, with a focus on simplicity and ease of integration into DevOps pipelines.

• Less complex but still provides necessary integrations for DevOps, making it a good fit for organizations seeking a lighter touch in cloud.


7. User Experience


• CyberArk PAM:

• Known for its powerful but complex interface. The extensive features can make it more challenging to navigate for non-expert users.

• Delinea PAM:

• Focuses on providing a simplified, intuitive user interface, which appeals to organizations looking for a solution that doesn’t require extensive training for users and administrators.


Summary:


• CyberArk PAM: Best for large enterprises with complex environments requiring robust, highly customizable PAM solutions with advanced analytics and threat detection.

• Delinea PAM: Best for organizations of all sizes, especially small-to-medium businesses (SMBs) or enterprises looking for a simpler, more cost-effective solution with a faster deployment and cloud-friendly approach.


Choosing between CyberArk and Delinea depends on the complexity of your infrastructure, your organization’s size, budget, and the level of customization and control you need over privileged access.

21 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page